Social Psychology

The student researcher selected a teenage couple seance on a bench outside a local high school . The subjects were a humanness and a cleaning char , both Caucasians . The man was some his early 20 s , has wavy , light brown hair , and wears a plain , sporty shirt , comfortable cotton shorts , and sneakers . He appeared to be really laid-back and to be into sports . The woman , on the separate raft , had short , straight blonde hair , and wore a green spaghetti top , Capri pants , and sandals . She was thin , sexy , and bewitching . As the observation begun , the members of the couple were already talking to separately some other , with the arm of the man over the shoulders of the woman , who , at the same time , was resting her head on the man s shoulderIn the scratch line 10 minutes , the student researcher observed for non-verbal cues . angiotensin converting enzyme of the salient observations was that the man did not physically let go of his girlfriend even for genius instance . He unendingly touched her hand , waist , arms , or cheeks . The woman , on the other hand stayed comfortably sett conduct around the arms of her boyfriend spell they were talking . She spoke more(prenominal) than her boyfriendThe verbal behavior was because observed during the next 10 minutes . Direct quotations were noted in to determine a presence of a pattern in the flow of the conference . It was seen that the woman did more in verbal communication finished sharing her personal experiences and stories . The man , on the other hand , laughed along with his girlfriend and agreed to most of what she was saying while he continued to physically touch her . This consistent preponderance of bodily connection amongst the couple - as led dominantly by the man - was most probably fueled by physical attraction . Hence , based on these case and according to Heffner (2001 , par .

12 , the student researcher gave a hypothesis which stated that the woman will continue to raceway the conversation while the man will talk infrequently and will remain physically intimate with his girlfriendDuring the subsequent 20 minutes , the student researcher counted the verbal cues that took place between the couple s conversation through tallying . Specifically , the observation focus on the times that the man and the woman talked independently , be it in opening a or in responding to the other person s remark . The individual amounts of verbal cues of the couple were then multiplied to the length of the verbal expression executed by each . These were then compared in to determine who primarily turn tail the conversationThe computed findings showed that the woman spoke significantly more than her boyfriend . She was the one who initiated new s , cracked jokes , and gave opinions regularly . The man , on the other hand maintained his simple gestures and responses toward her girlfriend . He spoke based on his own initiative very rarelyWith relation to the other half of the hypothesis , it was also seen that in the second part of the entire naturalistic observation , the man continued...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .