Preparation for Disaster Response & Recovery

Or in other words, the fire department and police department need to know what to expect from every other once every arrives at a disaster scene. That brings up the structure on the Incident Command Method (ICS), which anticipates quite a few on the problems of interagency cooperation and chain of command.

2. It need to be settled in advance that men and women on the right expertise have primary authority more than specific aspects of the disaster--for instance medical emergency experts having authority more than patient care and transport, experienced fire and police personnel with authority more than research and rescue. And all personnel throughout agencies need to realize how they will coordinate with one another at a given scene. Procedures for assessing situations and for triaging victims should be in location prior to disasters so that the assessment and triage can be the focus of activity--not confusion about procedures. If they're in location they can be adapted for far more popular usage and thus be much more effective.

All of this can be dependent on multiorganizational cooperation in between federal government and private-sector groups, plus coordination in the media at the planning stage so how the media do not grow to be adversaries at crisis times. The community ought to also have a picture of how casualties are handled at a scene and how firms respond, along with confidence that new hires in response agencies will had been trained in triage.

 

Many of these difficulties can be resolved by recourse to far better communication and better in a single agency of how other agencies operate. For example, the Incident Command Procedure is a strong resource for bringing uniformity towards language of disaster management. It involves both planning response activities. Van der Heide says it is not a "committee process" where each smaller detail is resolved but a "team process" that "by approaches of a sharing of objectives and priorities, formulates a set of collective directions to address the needs of the entire incident and which reduces duplication and omission of important tasks" (2000, p. 59).

A third controversy involves "maladaptive behavior." This can be a myth that common panic and ultimate chaos, such as looting and violence, prevails in disasters; that has historically been the view of FEMA. Search has discovered that numerous emergency responders have historically thought that, and this sort of myths are often repeated by the media. However, systematic look for into disasters "yielded an entirely numerous picture" of individuals acting in "controlled and adaptive ways" (Van der Heide, 2000, p. 25, citing Mileti, et al., 1957; Quarantelli, 1960, 1965, & 1972; and Wenger, et al., 1975).

sponse protocols. Since community resources for instance hospitals are going to be stretched during a disaster, people ought to understand the capabilities of local-area hospitals. Finally, the community ought to understand that individuals need to respond to disaster announcements from emergency personnel at times of disaster; it's a matter of educating the public. Meanwhile, disaster responders plan for a program dealing with public.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.