Plato & Aristotle

The clean consideration of the wreak of spontaneous miscarriage must include what is good for the society and not merely the unmarried. If the abortion is to save the life of the woman, then abortion might be chastely defensible, for the rights of the individual would have to be weighed against the good of the friendship. If the abortion is for the convenience of the woman, then it would not be examplely defensible to Aristotle.

Aristotle believes that what makes a personal moral are the actions that person takes. We all possess the capacity to be morally virtuous, precisely Aristotle says that only through habitual exercise of the virtues in action do we become morally virtuous. Abortion is sure not an act which can be exercised as a habit and yet be virtuous.

It is also an essential jump of the definition of moral virtue, according to Aristotle, that the habits practiced find a middle ground between excess and deficiency. The act of abortion is not an act which occurs in a vacuum but is the result of a desire to do away with

Despite some differences between the two, both Plato and Aristotle would likely be against abortion, based both on the trade good of the individual and the participation.

Plato echoes Aristotle's emphasis on the community everyplace the individual:

the result of a sexual act. Aristotle's consideration of morality has more to do with the individual over time rather than a single act. The moral person has practiced moral acts over a long period, and the more practiced the person is at moral action, the more likely she will behave morally in any single act.

Again, however, Aristotle, like Plato, stresses the good of the community over the good of the individual, or the perceived good of the individual. The abortion of convenience is clearly not good for the community, for it will abate life or the consideration of life. If the fetus can be sacrificed to convenience (as opposed to the life of the woman), the message to the community is that at least one aspect of life is not as important as convenience.

There are a calculate of differences between the moral philosophies of Aristotle and Plato. Aristotle seems the more consistent with respect to moral education, for example. The individual must be educated to see that bother is associated with immoral acts and pleasure with moral acts. This would result in a woman deciding against abortion except in the around extreme circumstances, because she would put the life of the fetus and the good of the community above her own convenience. Plato, on the other hand, includes in his moral education the deceptive lie which is designed to convince stack to stay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.